
Kuznetsov, A.; Gevorgyan, V. General and Practical One-Pot Synthesis of Dihydrobenzosiloles from Styrenes Org. Lett. ASAP January 24, 2012
No I’m not dead! Sorry it’s been so long since my last post but I have finally returned to New Reactions after a very very busy 4 weeks. But what a 4 weeks it’s been. So a quick update on the happenings in the Leadbeater lab starting with some bad news. We unfortunately did not get our flow paper into Organic Letters and have subsequently resubmitted to a more appropriate journal, Org. Proc. Res. Dev. where we believe it should get in. But really, that’s about it in terms of bad news. DiAndra and myself continue to make progress with the project we are working on (and its allowed me to get into all sorts of chemistry from making benzofuran to bromination of thiophenes). I’ve never worked with heterocycles as much as I have recent and I have greatly enjoyed it. We are a little behind where I would hope we would be but the reactions are progressing quite well and based on some recent findings, I think this one might be better suited in Organic Letters! As for other projects, we are in the midst of substrate screen for our collaboration with Dr. Tilley and it has been extremely successful! We hope to have that out by the middle of this year. I really am very excited to get that work out and a few other projects we have been working on that are near completion.
Last week was the start of the semester for UConn students meaning the the course that Mike is TAing (Adv. Org. Chem. Lab) has begun. I assisted him in preparing some of the labs as well as giving a joint lecture yesterday on ChemDraw. I think the students will really enjoy the reactions we have in store for them this semester (a RCM, a Sonogashira, Suzuki, Click, and Paal-Knorr to name a few)! I’m also giving a seminar next month on some of the work I’ve done thus far at UConn. I’m also looking into going to the ACS meeting in Philly in the fall to present there as well (hopefully with a bit more accomplished :P). I do find it weird sometimes that I used to be so scared of public speaking but now I really enjoy it. I actually look forward to talks. I still get nervous right before the talk of course, but as soon as I get past that first slide, things just slip into autopilot. Plus I genuinely love just talking chemistry! And with that, let’s get to it.
I’ve had the chance to read a number of articles since my last post (many of them quite excellent) and I’d like to share with you a few that stood out to me as cool/interesting/useful:
o-Iodoxybenzoic Acid, and Dimethyl Sulfoxide: describes a convenient and very effective way to make highly reactive ketoaldehydes in situ and trap them as quinoxalines. What I like about this is the shear number of examples done by the authors and the potentially variable approach that can be used by simply switching the phenylene diamine or varying the starting aldehyde.
This week’s article comes from, you guessed it, Org. Lett. Its by a Dr. Vladimir Gevorgyan at the University of Illinois at Chicago, whose work I have been following for some time (this being the second article of his I will be featuring). Gevorgyan does chemistry that is near and dear to me, namely small ring synthesis, organosilyl work, C-H bond functionalization, and heterocycle synthesis. He’s sort of a jack of all trades when it comes to his chemistry, but he publishes very good work (in only the top named journals). In this new article, he focuses on a new (or arguably a very recently discovered) class of organosilyl compounds: dihydrobenzosiloles. Prior to the release of this article, no effective synthetic method was available to access these compounds. One example was given by Hartwig in a 2005 paper, but synthesis of these compounds was not the main focus (hence the article gives only one example under very harsh conditions). Dibenzosiloles and biarylbenzosiloles are far better known in the literature.

Seeking a route to these compounds, Gevorgyan decided to use a two-stage approach to their synthesis. The first step with be β-hydrosilylation of a styrene derivative using diphenylsilane as their hydrosilylation source. That would give the desired phenethyldiphenylsilane compound. With that in hand, a dehydrogenative cyclization could then be used to obtain the elusive dihydrobenzosilole. However, like most things in chemistry, nothing is as easy in practice as it is in theory. Their first step was, simply put, known put somewhat impractical. Hydrosilylation of stryenes using diphenylsilane was known using some late transition metals (gold, rhodium etc.) but none were inexpensive and easy. Hydrosilylation of simple olefins was known using much more affordable nickel based catalysts but it was unknown whether these systems were compatible with stryenes. So rather than finding a new route, Gevorgyan explored some nickel catalysts to mediate the desired hydrosilylation. He ultimately found that NiBr2(PPh3)2 worked best after screen a plethora of nickel catalyst. With the hydrosilylation problem addressed, Gevorgyan turned to the cyclization step. Using a bit of inspiration from some previous findings he was able to use a general method for silylating aromatics to induce his cyclization. Better yet, he found this two step process could be conducted in a single flask in excellent overall yield!

After screening a variety of styrene derivatives, he found that only meta styrene substrates proved problematic. They lead to regiochemical isomers (whose ratio was influenced by sterics). m-fluorostyrene was the worst offender of this giving a 2:1 regiochemical ratio. Gevorgyan then investigated α-phenyl and α-methyl stryenes to see if the alkene substitution patterned played any role and in fact it did. These substrates were far more difficult to hydrosilylate and hence the addition of a LA catalyst was necessary. By adding B(C6F5)3, 3-methylbenzosilole and 3-phenyldehydrobenzosilole could successfully be accessed.

Gevorgyan finally got to my favorite part of discovering new reactions: mechanism proposal. After some study, he was able to determine that electron-withdrawing groups on the styrene accelerated the reaction dramatically. Moreover, kinetic isotope studies showed that the second cyclization step was likely the rate-determining step. Bearing this information in mind, the following mechanism was proposed (and its cool!):

Finally all good methods papers end with an application. Gevorgyan used his dihydrobenzosiloles to not only synthesize benzosiloles by DDQ oxidation but also to access dihydrobenzofuran derivatives by peroxide oxidation of the silyl moiety followed by Mitsunobu-mediated cyclization.

Overall I found this to be a excellent article by Gevorgyan and co-workers. Dihydrobenzosiloles are very unusual and interesting compounds (though I’m a bit biased since I came from Dr. Tilley’s group and therefore I love silicon-related molecules). I look forward to future articles from the Gevorgyan group. That’s all for now…Ckellz…signing off…
2 Comments
Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI
i agree that Dihydrobenzosiloles are very unusual and interesting compounds. Im glad you also have this opinion
[…] Murakami Group details a interesting strained-ring expansion strategy to access silaindanes (see my previous post about another awesome method to access this sort of […]